Reviewer: Andrew Michrowski, Planetary Association for Clean Energy (PACE). Assessment date: September 3, 2018. Document: PACE expert peer review.
Andrew Michrowski’s PACE assessment supports the mathematical approach used to model the interaction between a 2.4 GHz field and the Aires C32S resonator. The research report was managed by I. Serov, with K. Korshunov, I. Soltovskaya, T. Shamko and consultants A. Kopyltsov and A. Jukna.
Model reviewed
The review identifies the C32S geometry used in the 2018 Aires Guardian: 32 axes, four fractal levels and 1,185,921 rings. It discusses the calculated field response and superposition, interpreting the model as a basis for understanding the resonator’s operation.
PACE’s assessment
Michrowski finds the report credible and instructive and recommends extending the model’s incidence conditions. In particular, he notes that uniform input from all directions does not cover every real environment, and proposes singular, multiple and varying inputs. This is a specific engineering development path connecting the model to broader testing.
Follow the evidence
Explore this research topic · Connect the physics and biological research · Publication and external review
Andrew Michrowski prepared this expert peer review for American Aires through the Planetary Association for Clean Energy. The original assessment above preserves his conclusions and recommendations in full.
Researchers and connected evidence
- Andrew A. Michrowski: PACE peer reviewer.
- Igor N. Serov: Research framework and modeling.
Follow the EEG and cardiovascular research through its original reports, expert peer reviews and later publications. Human physiological research · How the research developed · Complete research archive.
Updated October 25, 2026 · Josh, Aires. Original research and assessments remain credited to their authors.