Aires takes the evidence of EMF-related biological disruption seriously enough to act. The question “Is 5G safe?” deserves more than a reference to a compliance limit. It deserves the original studies, an explanation of what researchers measured, and useful choices for the environment you live in.
Experiments at frequencies used by 5G have reported oxidative changes, altered neurobiology and developmental effects. Those findings are reasons to investigate and improve electromagnetic environments now. Understanding the actual exposure—frequency, signal pattern, duration and biological model—makes that case stronger.
What does “5G radiation” actually mean?
5G is a mobile-network technology, not one frequency. It operates across lower and middle frequency bands, including bands around 700 MHz and 3.5 GHz, and higher bands such as 28 GHz. The 3GPP/ETSI radio specification separates frequency ranges and operating bands. Your phone’s supported bands and the local network determine what is used.
5 GHz Wi-Fi is different from 5G cellular. A 3.5 GHz laboratory signal is also not automatically the same as a deployed 5G signal: modulation describes how information changes the wave over time. These distinctions matter when reading the studies.
Original experiments that make the biological question concrete
Türkiye: brain oxidative changes and neuronal effects at 3.5 GHz
Bektas and colleagues’ 2022 rat experiment used 3.5 GHz radiation for two hours a day over 30 days, comparing healthy and diabetic animals with corresponding controls. The researchers reported lower total antioxidant status, higher oxidant and hydrogen-peroxide measures, changes in metabolic signaling molecules and more degenerated neurons in the hippocampus.
The carrier frequency is relevant to 5G discussions, but the paper specifies a GSM-modulated signal. It provides evidence of adverse biological effects in that animal protocol, not a direct test of a commercial 5G network.
Spain: developmental and behavioral effects at 700 and 3,500 MHz
In Torres-Ruiz and colleagues’ 2024 study, zebrafish embryos received one- or four-hour exposures to unmodulated signals. Researchers reported organ-morphology changes, altered activity, anxiety-like behavior and habituation, and reduced acetylcholinesterase activity. Mortality, hatching and body length were unchanged. Effects were generally more pronounced at 700 MHz, particularly after four hours.
This is an important reminder that “higher frequency” is not itself a biological risk ranking. The model and measured response matter, alongside the frequency.
What a study using a 5G-modulated signal found
A 2025 human-skin-cell experiment tested a 5G-modulated 3.5 GHz signal. It found no significant increase in the measured oxidative-stress markers and no impairment of the DNA-repair pathway examined under its conditions. That result helps define where an effect was not observed; it does not reverse the animal findings or test every tissue, exposure pattern or long-term outcome.
The research supports serious investigation, not a claim that every exposure produces the same result. Aires’ position is to act on the evidence of biological disruption while continuing to test the conditions, mechanisms and interventions that matter.
Why the electromagnetic environment matters beyond one power reading
A 5G phone operates alongside Wi-Fi, Bluetooth wearables, nearby phones and other connected equipment. Household wiring and appliances contribute different, lower-frequency fields. Each source has its own location, frequency, timing and pattern of activity.
Transmission power is useful information, but it is only one part of that description. A brief meter reading cannot capture every frequency and activity pattern, and it cannot measure a biological response. The guide to EMF measurements and biology explains those differences.
Long-term health research must also contend with changing devices, networks and exposure histories. The difficulty of answering every long-term question does not erase the effects measured in controlled experiments. It is a reason to improve exposure characterization and research, while making informed choices today.
Where Aires’ 5G-related research fits
Aires develops resonator technology designed to organize electromagnetic interactions toward more stable, biologically supportive conditions while connected technology remains usable. Its research asks both a physical question—what changes in the field interaction—and a biological question—what changes in living systems.
28 GHz: a physical model of the resonator interaction
The 2020 original 28 GHz report calculates field strength and energy-flux distribution around a patterned Aires resonator. The authors describe redistribution into a stationary spatial pattern and interpret that modeled response as coherent transformation. This is a computational study of the resonator geometry; its 64-axis structure is not a 64-person trial.
Read the simulation methods and outputs alongside the 2026 infrared material experiment to follow the engineering thread.
Human physiology: a separate line of device evidence
Sysoev–Budko’s 2026 peer-reviewed study examined mobile-phone exposure and Lifetune ONE in 24 men aged 20–24. The authors reported a return toward background EEG parameters during the four minutes following initial activation, and increased EEG coherence after seven days. The original publication, pages 95–104 identifies the GSM phone and protocol.
The physical simulation and the human experiment answer different parts of the development question. The human study is phone-exposure evidence, not a 5G-specific clinical trial. Our decades-of-research overview connects the physics, cellular, animal and human work to the exact originals.
Practical choices without giving up connected life
- Review close, sustained use. Consider where you carry the phone, how you use it during calls and where it sits overnight.
- Make optional radio activity deliberate. Check cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth individually. A switch from 5G to another network mode changes the connection; it does not establish a measured health improvement.
- Look at the whole setup. Include the router, charging station and wearables. Start with phone charging and smartwatch radios and symptoms.
- Understand EMF blocking. A complete shield prevents the communication it blocks. Partial shielding changes signal propagation, and its practical effect depends on the setup. Evaluate the specific claim and measurements.
- Evaluate Aires through its evidence. Compare the physical and biological findings, then explore current Aires products by the device or environment you want to address.
Aires’ role is to make the research accessible, develop and test environmental interventions, and help inform better personal choices and future standards. Regulatory agreement is not the starting requirement for that work.
Updated November 2, 2026 · Josh, Aires. Original findings are attributed and linked to their researchers and publications.