Detecting Conductivity Variations in Water under the Action of the Radiation Emitted by a Radiotelephone With or Without the AIRES Electromagnetic Abnormalities Neutralizer

This site has limited support for your browser. We recommend switching to Edge, Chrome, Safari, or Firefox.

Up To 35% Off Lifetune One, Flex and Zone

Cart 0

Congratulations! Your order qualifies for free shipping You are $100 away from free shipping.
No more products available for purchase

Products
Subtotal Free
Shipping, taxes, and discount codes are calculated at checkout

Your Cart is Empty

Detecting Conductivity Variations in Water under the Action of the Radiation Emitted by a Radiotelephone With or Without the AIRES Electromagnetic Abnormalities Neutralizer

Detecting Conductivity Variations in Water Under Radiotelephone Radiation (Zenin)

Download Original PDF

1

THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR TRADI- TIONAL MEDICAL TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSTICS METHODS

REPORT

on a Research Work on the Subject:

Detecting Conductivity Variations in Water under the Action of the

Radiation Emitted by a Radiotelephone With or Without

the AIRES Electromagnetic Abnormalities Neutralizer

Research Manager:

S. V. Zenin, Doctor of Biological Sciences,

Head of the Problem Laboratory for Scientific Substantiation

of the Traditional Medical Treatment and Diagnostics Me-

thods (the Clinical and Experimental Research Center for

Traditional Medical Treatment and Diagnostics Methods of

the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health)

Traditional Medical Treatment and Diagnostics Methods of

2

The Problem Laboratory for Scientific Substantiation of Traditional Medical

Treatment and Diagnostics Methods (the Clinical and Experimental Research Center for

Traditional Medical Treatment and Diagnostics Methods, the Russian Federation Ministry

of Public Health) instituted an investigation into the effect of the radiation emitted by a

radiotelephone on the conductivity of water with or without the Aires Neutralizer of Elec-

tromagnetic Abnormalities. The investigation was carried out by the method of differen-

tial-conductometric measurement of water samples (type “Super-Q”) according to a spe-

cially developed and patented technique (Patent #2109301, Priority Date: September 30,

1996).

The conductivity of the cuvette is proportional to the current strength measured.

By using the information system of water as a detector, and by applying a differen-

tial scheme to measuring such an integral physical parameter of water as conductivity, we

can observe variations in the structural state of water in an experimental sample as com-

The measurement procedure consisted of the following operations:

1. Each chamber of a two-chamber cuvette (or each of two separate cuvettes) was

filled with a similar amount of distilled water. Each chamber, used as a shoul-

der of a bridge, was connected to a steady power supply source, and a measur-

ing device was used to estimate the difference between the readings of each of

the shoulder, which reflected how the experimental and the control water sam-

2. The power supplies were turned on for a short period of time (20-30 sec.) suffi-

The obtained “zero” indication was taken as a reference value.

3. The chambers were emptied of the measured water and then filled with a new

portion of water taken from the same common container. Then operations 1 and

2 were repeated.

4. The set was considered to be operational if the reference value remained un-

changed during the entire experiment after refilling the chambers and turning

on the power supplies again.

5. Two small containers were prepared and then each one of them was filled with

an amount of water necessary for carrying out the measurement. One of the

filled containers was set aside so as to use its water for filling the control cham-

ber, and the other container was intended for being exposed to an energoinfro-

3

6. In general, exerting some kind of action via bioenergoinformation transfer

should be made in another room similar to that where the measurements are

carried out.

7. Besides the requirement to follow the standard measurement procedure, it is

imperative that the experimenter should not affect in any way the water sam-

ples, for which purpose the control water sample must also be taken out from

the measurement room to another room where the experimenter is not present.

8. After the exposure was over, both the control and the experimental water con-

tainers were brought in the measurement room. It was preferred that both the

experimental and the control water samples were poured into the respective

chambers in a simultaneous and similar manner.

9. By simultaneously turning on the power supplies in the shoulder of the bridge,

the difference between the readings taken from the experimental and the control

water samples was measured. The difference between the readings was consi-

dered to be objective if another measurement gave a similar result or if the dif-

ference tended smoothly to pass to a new steady value.

10. After completing the measurements, the chambers were emptied of water and

filled with another portion of water from the same common container and a

control test was performed to measure the initial “zero” value.

11. The experiment was considered to be successful if the “zero” value agreed with

the initial one taken in the beginning of the experiment or was within an ex-

pected range of the drift of the zero line due to some temperature and pressure

variations in the surroundings.

Between 1995 and 2001 the above technique was elaborated in the investigations

into the effect of dozens of different bioenergetic devices on the conductivity of water. The

average magnitude of the water conductivity difference produced by different bioenergetic

devices was from five to 10 A (NB: The conductivity of the cuvette is proportional to the

current strength).

The Results of the Investigation

The following data were obtained in the investigation into how the conductivity of

water was changed under the action of the radiation emitted by a radiotelephone with or

without the Aires Neutralizer of Electromagnetic Abnormalities:

4

Table

Exposure Time: 16.45-17.15 and 17.20-17.50 (April 15, 2002)

Time of observation

Equation: The kinetics of water elec- troconductivity variations after the action of a radi- otelephone,  A The kinetics of water elec- troconduct...

17.16 17.21 - 8 A - 3 A

17.17 17.22 - 6 A - 2 A

17.18 17.23 - 5 A - 2 A

17.19 17.24 - 5 A 0 A

The values listed in the above table are primarily indicative of the objectivation of

the protective effect of the Aires Neutralizer of Electromagnetic Abnormalities. The kinet-

ics of the water electroconductivity variations in the presence of the neutralizer points to

the fact that the effect of the radiation emitted by a radiotelephone on the structured state

of water is compensated completely.

From the data obtained, we can state that the observed considerable compensation

of the effect of a radiotelephone on the water electroconductivity provides reason enough

to undertake further research.