Este sitio web tiene ciertas restriucciones de navegación. Le recomendamos utilizar buscadores como: Edge, Chrome, Safari o Firefox.
       SALE! 20% Off Lifetune Go or Flex   25% Off When You Buy Go & Flex In Same Order      Discount Applied at checkout.

Havas 2015 Case Study 2: Pulse-Wave, HRV and Bio-Well Observations

Publication status: individual research report, not a population clinical trial. The original report carries Magda Havas’s Trent University affiliation. This does not by itself establish institutional endorsement, funding independence or a journal peer-review process.

Researcher: Magda Havas. Experiment: August 20, 2015; report dated September 5. Sample: one 46-year-old woman. Device: Aires Defender Infinity.

Protocol

The fixed sequence was baseline, RF exposure, RF plus the device, then the device alone. Sources included a router, cordless-phone base and baby monitor. The report describes blinding, but does not document the placebo implementation used in the first case.

Findings

Selected pulse-wave indices declined during RF exposure and moved toward baseline in the RF-plus-device condition. These observations are the favorable result of interest. Heart rate and blood pressure did not show benefit; HRV changes were small. Bio-Well/GDV energy and balance changes were explicitly nonsignificant.

Limitations

One participant and a fixed order cannot establish a reproducible population effect or distinguish treatment from recovery and time effects. Bio-Well software scores are not direct measurements of disease, field depolarization, or an established clinical benefit. This second case is a separate observation, but it is not a controlled replication demonstrating efficacy.

Original report

Read Havas’s full September 5, 2015 report (PDF) · Read the first case and placebo protocol.

Sources and disclosure

This is an Aires editorial summary. Aires sells the products discussed and has a commercial interest in the research. Institutional affiliation, an external author, or a third-party opinion alone does not establish financial independence. Where a linked report does not establish funding or the sponsor’s role, those details remain unconfirmed. Original researchers retain authorship of their work.

The original-source evidence library distinguishes journal articles, conference papers, research reports and expert opinions. Reports, translations and later manuscripts describing the same experiment should not be counted as independent replications.

Editorial update: October 25, 2026 · Josh, Aires. This page explains research and its limitations; it is not a diagnosis or a claim that an Aires product prevents or treats disease.