Intermediate Report, Stage 2 — National Research University ITMO, St. Petersburg, 2025. Cipher: 225011. Theme: “Study of the interaction of Lifetune-type resonators with electromagnetic fields created by communication networks.”
Overview
This Stage 2 technical report from ITMO University extends the mathematical modeling of the Lifetune resonator’s interaction with communication network electromagnetic fields, adds experimental thermal validation of the model, and describes the development of two measurement instruments: an EEG mock-up for brain activity registration and a WiFi field distribution mapping device. The central physics finding is that arrays of 4 or 6 resonators produce significantly greater response amplitudes than a single resonator — validating the basis for multi-resonator device configurations.
Authors and Institution
Principal Investigator: Prof. G.N. Lukyanov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, National Research University ITMO, St. Petersburg
Co-investigators: A.V. Kopyltsov (Section 1 modeling), S.L. Makharov, V.A. Prokhorev, A.A. Rassadin, M.A. Afanasiev, S.A. Dorokhov
Year: 2025 (Intermediate, Stage 2)
Volume: 44 pages, 28 figures, 1 table, 9 references
Section 1: Mathematical Modeling of Resonator Combinations
1.1 Single Resonator
The physico-mathematical model of Lifetune resonator interaction with EM radiation (previously published by the authors) was applied to compute the distribution of electric field strength across the resonator surface. Results were consistent with prior published findings, confirming the model’s predictive validity.
1.2 Four-Resonator Block (Tetragonal Configuration)
Modeling of four resonators positioned adjacent to each other (tetragonal arrangement) tested the hypothesis of inter-resonator coupling. Confirmed: the four resonators interact with each other, producing a collective response with progressive development of excitation transferred from resonator to resonator.
1.3 Combination Results
Key finding: Combinations of four and six resonators produce a significantly greater response amplitude compared to a single resonator. This provides theoretical basis for why multi-resonator configurations (Lifetune Zone Max) show stronger effects than single-resonator products.
Section 2: Thermal Validation of the Model
To independently validate the mathematical model, experimental thermal measurements of the resonator surface were conducted using a Testo 890 thermal imaging camera during controlled heating and cooling via a Peltier element. The measured temperature values of the central part of the resonator (with surface relief) were significantly different from the periphery — consistent with model predictions for electromagnetic field strength distribution. This thermal experiment provides non-computational, physically measured confirmation that the resonator’s structured surface behaves as the model predicts.
Section 3: Brain Activity Registration Mock-Up (EEG Device)
A mock-up EEG device was developed and placed on the head of a subject, capturing signals from defined measurement points. This instrument enables controlled comparison of brain activity signals with and without resonator influence under standardized conditions, supporting the next stage of EEG research.
Section 4: WiFi Field Distribution Mapping Device
A room-scale WiFi field distribution monitoring device was developed based on the ESP-12F module (ESP8266). The device measures RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator) in dBm at different room locations, transmitting data via MQTT protocol. This enables spatial mapping of actual WiFi field intensity distribution — enabling experimental comparison of field distributions with and without resonators.
Conclusions
“Modeling of the response of different resonator combinations to electromagnetic wave exposure was performed. Modeling was conducted for one, four, and six resonators. It was shown that combinations of four and six resonators give a significantly greater amplitude of response compared to the case of a single resonator.
The resonator response to thermal exposure provided additional confirmation of the model on which computer modeling was based. The measured temperature values of the central part of the resonator (with relief) significantly differed [from peripheral areas] — confirming the model.”
Significance
- Multi-resonator physics validation — provides theoretical grounding for why larger Aires devices show stronger effects than single-resonator products
- First thermal validation of the model — uses infrared thermal emission (different physical principle from EM computation) to confirm model predictions
- Measurement infrastructure for future studies — EEG mock-up and WiFi field mapper enable the next stage of the research program
Full Citation
Lukyanov G.N., Kopyltsov A.V., Makharov S.L., Prokhorev V.A., Rassadin A.A. et al. “Study of the interaction of Lifetune-type resonators with electromagnetic fields created by communication networks (Intermediate, Stage 2).” ITMO University, Cipher 225011, St. Petersburg, 2025.
Original language: Russian. English translation by Aires Research Team.
Physics & Engineering Validation Series
Serov, Korshunov & Kopyltsov 2018 — original mathematical model
Lukyanov et al. 2022 (Springer) — semiconductor wafer simulation, Stage 1
VGTU 2016 — independent Lithuanian engineering validation
Biological studies:
IFRAN/SFERA 2025 (Lifetune Zone Max, WiFi6) — VMA 2024 (EEG/ECG)
→ Physics & Engineering Evidence