The Core Question: What Does the Resonator Actually Produce?
A key question about any EMF modulation device is: what exactly does it do to the electromagnetic field? This 2018 paper by Serov, Korshunov, and Kopyltsov addresses that question computationally, using a mathematical model of electromagnetic wave interaction with the self-affine ring surface of an Aires resonator exposed to 6 GHz Wi-Fi radiation.
The model uses established electromagnetic physics (Maxwell’s equations, Yee 1966; Weiland 1977) with explicit treatment of both reflection (from flat silicon surface regions) and diffraction (through the self-affine ring slots, using the single-slit diffraction intensity formula). The resonator surface is discretized into a grid; the 3D space above the resonator is discretized into cubic cells; and the electric field strength E is computed at each receiver point for each time step across 1 second of interaction.
The Resonator: Aires C20S5G
The resonator modeled is the Aires C20S5G — a silicon wafer measuring 7.6 × 7.6 mm × 0.5 mm, containing 4,084,101 circular grooves of varying diameter. The groove cross-section is rectangular: 0.2 μm wide and 0.6 μm deep. The pattern is constructed from a base element of diameter 0.925 mm through affine transformations (parallel translation, scaling) that produce a self-affine ring structure. The incident radiation source is modeled as a hemisphere of large radius (much larger than the resonator), simulating Wi-Fi router radiation at a 10 m distance with field strength E₀ = 10 V/m.
Mathematical Framework
The model computes the electric field E at any receiver point A due to all rays DCA — where D is the source point on the hemisphere, C is the interaction point on the resonator surface, and A is the receiver. Two interaction rules apply:
- Surface points: Incident radiation reflects at angle of incidence = angle of reflection (specular reflection)
- Slot/groove points: Incident radiation is absorbed and diffracted, following the standard diffraction intensity formula: Iβ/I₀ = [sin(πb·sinβ/λ) / (πb·sinβ/λ)]²
The total field at the receiver is the superposition of all contributing rays. The time-domain computation is run with timesteps from Δt = 10⁻¹² s to 10⁻² s to capture both fast and slow oscillation dynamics.
Results: Two New Frequencies Emerge
Frequency Conversion by the Aires Resonator
- Input frequency: 6 GHz (incident Wi-Fi EMF)
- Output frequency 1: ν₁ = 6.85 GHz — periodic, stable, sustained
- Output frequency 2: ν₂ = 5.38 GHz — periodic, stable, sustained
- Other frequencies: Non-periodic radiation (chaotic appearance)
- Location: Both periodic outputs appear above the central part of the resonator, 24 μm above the surface
| Frequency Type | Value | Character | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incident (input) | 6.000 GHz | Periodic (Wi-Fi router) | Source (hemisphere, 10 m) |
| Output 1 | 6.85 GHz | Periodic, stable | Above central resonator region |
| Output 2 | 5.38 GHz | Periodic, stable | Above central resonator region |
| Other outputs | Multiple | Non-periodic | Distributed above resonator |
Biological Significance: Cellular Resonance Frequencies
This finding provides a partial mechanistic explanation for why the Aires resonator’s biological effects are consistent and non-random: rather than producing broadband noise or simply attenuating the field, the resonator converts incident Wi-Fi EMF into specific periodic outputs at frequencies that may interact coherently with biological systems. The non-periodic component at other frequencies represents the restructured field that replaces the chaotic, biologically disruptive character of the original Wi-Fi radiation.
Connection to the Broader Research Program
This 2018 mathematical modeling study is part of a long-running computational physics research program on the Aires resonator:
- 2007 (Kopyltsov, Lukyanov, Serov, HoloExpo-2007): Modeling of interaction between EMR and silicon surface with affine relief
- 2007 (Kopyltsov, Lukyanov, Serov, PhysCon 2007 IEEE): Coherent emission of EM radiation from the self-affine semiconductor surface
- 2018 (Serov, Korshunov, Kopyltsov, Engineering Bulletin of the Don): Mathematical modeling of ring-structured surface interaction with 6 GHz EMF — this paper
- 2022 (Kopyltsov, Lukyanov, Serov, ICICT 2022 / Springer): Computer simulation of coupled ring groove response to EM radiation
- 2026 (Lukyanov, Makarov, ICICT 2026): Experimental thermal imaging validation of the charge concentration model
The 2018 frequency conversion findings are cited in the chromosome aberrations study by Dyuzhikova et al. (2018), linking the computational mechanism to observed biological outcomes: the output frequencies (6.85 and 5.38 GHz) are in ranges that may interact with cellular machinery, providing a physical basis for the observed normalization of chromosome aberration frequency in bone marrow cells when Aires resonators were present during Wi-Fi exposure.
Publication Details
- Journal: Engineering Bulletin of the Don — Инженерный вестник Дона (ivdon.ru)
- Issue: No. 4, 2018
- URL: ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4y2018/5278
- Publisher: Electronic Scientific Journal « Engineering Bulletin of the Don », 2007–2018
Source: Serov, I.N., Korshunov, K.A., & Kopyltsov, A.V. (2018). Mathematical modeling of the interaction of a ring-structured surface with high-frequency electromagnetic radiation. Engineering Bulletin of the Don (Inzhenerny Vestnik Dona), No. 4, 2018. ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4y2018/5278