Este sitio web tiene ciertas restriucciones de navegación. Le recomendamos utilizar buscadores como: Edge, Chrome, Safari o Firefox.

       Buy More Save More! 20% Off Any 3, 25% Off 4, 30% Off 5 Single Devices.        

Evaluation of the effectiveness of using aires shield electronic Anomaly neutralizers to reduce the negative influence of a Cellular phone's electromagnetic field

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using Aires Shield Electronic Anomaly Neutralizers to Reduce the Negative Influence of a Cellular Phone's Electromagnetic Field

I. Serov & Professor V. Sysoev — Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences (2014)

Download Original PDF

Abstract

Research was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of using Aires Shield electromagnetic anomaly neutralizers to reduce the negative influence of the electromagnetic field caused by the operation of a cellular phone on the brain's bioelectrical activity. 11 human subjects were tested, each of which participated in two experiments: a baseline study (using a mobile phone without an Aires Shield) and the main study (using a mobile phone with an Aires Shield). A mobile phone operating on the GSM-900 standard was used. A 19-channel computerized electroencephalogram machine using 16 monopole electrodes in accordance with the internationally-recognized 10-20 system was employed. The research demonstrated that the elevation of the relative strength of theta and alpha rhythms — manifest when using a mobile phone on the exposed side without an Aires Shield — are virtually absent when it is used. Therefore, using an Aires Shield inhibits electromagnetic radiation from interacting with the brain's own bioelectric activity on the frequencies of the alpha and delta rhythms, which may be regarded as a protective effect.

Introduction

In Europe and the United States, the adopted standards for determining SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) levels from cellular phone radiation are based solely on the thermal effect, associated with the heating of body tissues. However, a number of works have discussed the presence of an informational effect [1, 2, 4].

The GSM-900 mobile phone standard transmits information using impulses joined into blocks. The duration of a single block is 4.616 ms, establishing the impulse frequency at approximately 217 Hz (1/4.616). Blocks of impulses between a mobile phone and a base station are grouped into multiblocks of 26 repetitions, producing a second frequency of 8.35 Hz (217/62). Certain phones in energy-conserving mode may also generate a third frequency: 2 Hz [3, 5].

The danger of this informational effect is that these frequencies can interact with the brain's own electroencephalographic activity: 217 Hz may resonate with the gamma rhythm, 8.35 Hz with the alpha rhythm, and 2 Hz with the delta rhythm. Thus, mobile phone use transmits signals capable of interacting with the brain's own bioelectric activity, thereby disrupting its function. This makes it important to protect the human brain when using a mobile phone.

Aires Shield electromagnetic anomaly neutralizers function as a universal three-dimensional Fourier filter. When an electromagnetic field interacts with the Aires Shield, the field undergoes a structural transformation that may cancel out the influence of the resonant frequencies (217 Hz, 8.35 Hz, and 2 Hz).

Research Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of using Aires Shield electromagnetic anomaly neutralizers to reduce the negative influence of a cellular phone's electromagnetic field on the brain's bioelectrical activity.

Methodology

11 men (ages 18 to 22 years) participated in the study. Each subject participated in two experiments: a baseline study (mobile phone without Aires Shield) and the main study (mobile phone with Aires Shield).

The research was conducted in the morning at 20°C. The 40-minute uninterrupted recording procedure included the following stages:

  1. Baseline EEG at rest (calm wakefulness).
  2. EEG with mobile phone in standby mode held next to the ear (3 minutes).
  3. EEG with mobile phone in call mode, no audio (3 minutes).
  4. EEG with mobile phone in talk mode, no audio (5 minutes).
  5. EEG 3, 5, and 10 minutes after turning off the phone.

Subjects sat in a darkened, soundproof room. Brain bioelectric activity was recorded by a 19-channel EEG machine with 16 monopole electrodes in the 10-20 system, 0–70 Hz band, 250 Hz discretization. Unpolarized silver chloride electrodes were placed at prefrontal (Fp1, Fp2), postfrontal (F3, F4), inferior (F7, F8), central (C3, C4), middle temporal (T3, T4), posttemporal (T5, T6), parietal (P3, P4), and occipital (O1, O2) sites, with reference electrodes on the earlobes.

The Win EEG software analyzed artifact-free EEG fragments using rhythm topography. Frequency ranges examined: delta (0.5–3 Hz), theta (4–7 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), beta-1 (14–25 Hz), beta-2 (26–35 Hz), gamma (36–50 Hz). 80–100 EEG fragments were analyzed per stage.

Results

Substantial changes in the spectral characteristics of EEG rhythms were conspicuous under mobile phone influence in virtually all left leads examined. The most typical finding was increased relative strength of delta and alpha rhythms, especially at stages 3 and 4, confirming data from other experiments. When using the electromagnetic anomaly neutralizers, no increase in relative rhythm strength was detected.

In leads on the side of the head opposite the mobile phone, no pattern was identified in rhythm strength changes.

Comparison of brain bioelectric activity with and without an Aires Shield detected statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences. The elevation of relative strength of delta and alpha rhythms — manifest on the exposed side without an Aires Shield — are virtually absent when it is used.

Conclusion

Using an Aires Shield electromagnetic oscillation neutralizer when working with GSM-900 mobile phones inhibits electromagnetic radiation from interacting with the brain's own bioelectric activity on the frequencies of the alpha and delta rhythms. This may be regarded as a protective effect.

Bibliography

  1. A.I. Zubrilkin, A.V. Ponomarev, S.V. Pobachenko. Biotropism of the Parameters of Active Radiation from Mobile Phones. Journal of Higher Learning Institutions. Physics. 2012;55(8/3):157–158.
  2. L.D. Usanova. Effects of the Influence of Electromagnetic Radiation at 1800 mHz on Living Objects: dissertation abstract, 2011. p. 18.
  3. Brenner RP et al. Computerized EEG spectral analysis in elderly, normal, demented and depressed subjects. Electroencephalography Clinical Neuropsychology. 1986;64:483–492.
  4. Croft RJ et al. Effect of 2G and 3G mobile phones on human alpha rhythms: Resting EEG in adolescent, young adults, and the elderly. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010;31(b):434–444.
  5. Hyland GJ. Physics and biology of mobile telephony. The Lancet. 2000;356(25):1833–1836.