Technical Q&A with Prof. Georgy Nikolaevich Lukyanov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, National Research University ITMO (Saint Petersburg). Translated from Russian.
Prof. Lukyanov is one of the principal investigators of the Aires resonator mechanism, with more than a decade of published research on the interaction of structured silicon surfaces with electromagnetic radiation. His 2022 paper (co-published in Springer’s Silicon journal) validated the Aires resonator mechanism using semiconductor wafer simulation methodology.
The following Q&A addresses four core technical questions about how the Aires resonator works, in Lukyanov’s own words.
Q1: How, step by step, does the counter-field generated by the microchip interact with surrounding electromagnetic radiation (EMR)? Why is the mobile phone signal not affected, while EMR is?
Lukyanov: The interaction scheme can be described as follows. Electromagnetic radiation falling from a source onto the surface of the Aires resonator “excites” the control field that the resonator generates. The resulting structurally-coherent field of higher density — as a first derivative — continues to interact with the EM field of the source, and a second derivative of the EM field emerges at a new quality level with a wider radius of coverage. This field response also begins to engage in the interaction. In this way, practically instantaneously, 4 levels of derived control EM fields arise, with the characteristics of a standing wave — forming a regular, stationary EM field that works as a Fourier filter, with a resulting coverage radius 12 times the dimensions of the Aires device itself.
The smartphone signal is merely a characteristic of the carrier wave of the EM field initiated by the mobile operator, and it is not changed. A simple analogy: imagine a wardrobe full of clothes thrown in haphazardly. You install shelves, organizing the clothes by category. The wardrobe is completely reorganized — but have you changed the clothes themselves? No. Likewise: the smartphone signal is not physically changed in any way.
Q2: How and why does this counter-field protect humans?
Lukyanov: The regular structure of the Aires resonator’s EM field maintains its properties up to a certain density of the interacting EM field — meaning it is constantly converting incoming EM radiation. It is precisely the regularity and symmetry underlying the resonator that creates a field state that is coherent or ordered at multiple internal structural levels. These levels support one another, forming a unified structure of the control EM field.
The density of the field resonance response — produced by the interaction of the resonator’s topological scheme with external EM radiation — is the determining factor. While the field density exceeds that of the background radiation, it acts as the dominant agent. Therefore, if external radiation were in a hard radioactive form, device effectiveness would be low. In all other cases, incident EM radiation will be converted into a coherent form, reducing its negative influence — associated primarily with high polarization and uneven wave distribution.
Q3: What mechanism operates during biocorrection, when we observe improvements in physiological parameters even in the absence of strong external EMR?
Lukyanov: There is no place on Earth where EM radiation is absent — the Earth’s geomagnetic field (Schumann resonance) and broadband solar radiation are always present. Humans have adapted to these fields over millennia; attempting to isolate from them leads to serious disruptions in the biological system.
Man-made EM fields are characterized by an absence of regularity and the presence of numerous zones of anomalous polarization. This leads to structural distortions and destruction of the natural EM framework. The Aires resonator converts man-made, irregular EM fields into coherent form, restoring the conditions under which biological systems evolved.
Q4: How was Emax = 3.44 × 10³ V/m measured? Can the counter-field be quantitatively evaluated without using a biological subject as indicator?
Lukyanov: The resonator, the human, and the phone — through the multi-frequency nonlinear resonance response of the resonator to external influence — form a unified system: a kind of resonance circuit that responds coherently to external influence.
All results “above the central part of the resonator” were obtained by modeling (computer simulation), not by direct measurement.
There is a method for quantitatively measuring not the counter-field itself, but rather the result of the interaction between the resonator and WiFi. See our most recent reports on the rat experiments: they include real three-dimensional field strength distribution graphs, constructed from measurement results both without and with the resonators. These provide direct physical evidence of the resonator’s effect on the electromagnetic field distribution in space.
— G.N. Lukyanov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, ITMO University
Editorial Note
Several key points from this Q&A are worth noting:
- The Fourier filter description is independently testable — it has been modeled computationally (Serov, Korshunov & Kopyltsov 2018; Lukyanov et al. 2022 in Springer’s Silicon).
- The phone signal is not altered — Lukyanov explicitly confirms: “the smartphone signal is not physically changed in any way.”
- Effectiveness limits are acknowledged — the device would not be effective against hard radioactive fields. This is a sign of scientific precision rather than overclaiming.
- 3D field measurements exist in the rat studies — Lukyanov notes that the IFRAN rat experiment reports include three-dimensional field strength distribution graphs measured with and without resonators, providing non-biological physical evidence of the resonator’s effect on field distribution.
Related Research: Mechanism and Validation
Serov, Korshunov & Kopyltsov 2018 — mathematical modeling, 6 GHz WiFi → 6.85 & 5.38 GHz periodic output
Lukyanov et al. 2022 (Springer) — semiconductor wafer EMF simulation
VGTU 2016 — physical resonator hardware testing
Biological outcomes referenced by Lukyanov:
VMA 2024 — Datova 2013 (HRV) — Dyuzhikova 2019
→ Physics & Engineering Evidence | → How Aires Works (FAQ)